By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ICCNICCNICCN
  • Home
  • Conferences
  • Events
  • Media
  • Publications
  • Resources
    • NCCN
    • ASCO
    • Hematology
Reading: DREAMM-8 study myeloma, Belantamab
Sign In
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
ICCNICCN
  • Home
  • Conferences
  • Events
  • Media
  • Publications
  • Resources
Search
  • Home
  • Conferences
  • Events
  • Media
  • Publications
  • Resources
    • NCCN
    • ASCO
    • Hematology

Trending →

T-DXd Plus Pertuzumab Receives FDA Approval, Shifting the Frontline HER2-Positive Paradigm

By MedOnc2
December 15, 2025

FDA Approves Niraparib Plus Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone for BRCA2-Mutated mCSPC

By MedOnc2
December 15, 2025

FDA Approves Durvalumab for Resectable Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

By MedOnc2
December 15, 2025

FDA Grants Traditional Approval to Pirtobrutinib (Jaypirca®) for CLL/SLL

By MedOnc2
December 15, 2025

Enfortumab Vedotin + Pembrolizumab for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC)

By MedOnc2
November 22, 2025
Login Sign In
Follow US
© ICCN All Rights Reserved.
Uncategorized

DREAMM-8 study myeloma, Belantamab

Medonc
Last updated: August 11, 2025 1:23 am
By Medonc
Share
1 Min Read
SHARE

Trial Overview

  • Design & Population
    DREAMM-8 is a randomized, open-label Phase III trial comparing:
    • BPd arm: belantamab mafodotin (B-Pd) combined with pomalidomide and dexamethasone
    • PVd arm: pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone
      It enrolled approximately 302 patients with RRMM who had prior lenalidomide exposure and documented progression, excluding those with prior BCMA-targeted therapy or bortezomib intolerance/refractoriness.

Key Findings

  • Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
    The BPd regimen demonstrated a significant PFS advantage. The 12-month PFS rate was 71% vs 51% in the PVd group (hazard ratio ~0.52)
  • Response Rates & Duration
    • Overall Response Rate (ORR): 77% with BPd vs 72% with PVd
    • Complete Response or Better: 40% vs 16% favoring BPd
    • Median Duration of Response: Not reached for BPd, vs ~17.5 months for PVd
  • Safety & Adverse Events
    Ocular adverse events were notably more frequent with BPd (grade 3/4 in 43% vs 2%). Overall AE rates were high across both arms (>95%) but manageable

Clinical Significance

  • These results mark a potential resurgence for belantamab mafodotin (Blenrep) in RRMM, especially following its market withdrawal after prior trial setbacks. Analysts are anticipating regulatory filings based on DREAMM-7/8 data to restore its role in treatment.
Share This Article
Facebook Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Email Copy Link Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • T-DXd Plus Pertuzumab Receives FDA Approval, Shifting the Frontline HER2-Positive Paradigm
  • FDA Approves Niraparib Plus Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone for BRCA2-Mutated mCSPC
  • FDA Approves Durvalumab for Resectable Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma
  • FDA Grants Traditional Approval to Pirtobrutinib (Jaypirca®) for CLL/SLL
  • Enfortumab Vedotin + Pembrolizumab for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC)

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

You Might Also Like ↷

Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma Chemotherapy Free Option

August 10, 2025

Bispecific Antibody Approval for Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

August 10, 2025

Phase IIISERENA-6 HR+ breast cancer

August 11, 2025

Myeloma induction: can AI generate a treatment algorithm ?

August 21, 2025
Interactive Cancer Care Network

Powered By Designjoom-Empowering Brands since 2010