By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ICCNICCNICCN
  • Home
  • Conferences
  • Events
  • Media
  • Publications
  • Resources
    • NCCN
    • ASCO
    • Hematology
Reading: DREAMM-8 study myeloma, Belantamab
Sign In
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
ICCNICCN
  • Home
  • Conferences
  • Events
  • Media
  • Publications
  • Resources
Search
  • Home
  • Conferences
  • Events
  • Media
  • Publications
  • Resources
    • NCCN
    • ASCO
    • Hematology

Trending →

T-DXd Plus Pertuzumab Receives FDA Approval, Shifting the Frontline HER2-Positive Paradigm

By MedOnc2
December 15, 2025

FDA Approves Niraparib Plus Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone for BRCA2-Mutated mCSPC

By MedOnc2
December 15, 2025

FDA Approves Durvalumab for Resectable Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

By MedOnc2
December 15, 2025

FDA Grants Traditional Approval to Pirtobrutinib (Jaypirca®) for CLL/SLL

By MedOnc2
December 15, 2025

Enfortumab Vedotin + Pembrolizumab for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC)

By MedOnc2
November 22, 2025
Login Sign In
Follow US
© ICCN All Rights Reserved.
Uncategorized

DREAMM-8 study myeloma, Belantamab

Medonc
Last updated: August 11, 2025 1:23 am
By Medonc
Share
1 Min Read
SHARE

Trial Overview

  • Design & Population
    DREAMM-8 is a randomized, open-label Phase III trial comparing:
    • BPd arm: belantamab mafodotin (B-Pd) combined with pomalidomide and dexamethasone
    • PVd arm: pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone
      It enrolled approximately 302 patients with RRMM who had prior lenalidomide exposure and documented progression, excluding those with prior BCMA-targeted therapy or bortezomib intolerance/refractoriness.

Key Findings

  • Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
    The BPd regimen demonstrated a significant PFS advantage. The 12-month PFS rate was 71% vs 51% in the PVd group (hazard ratio ~0.52)
  • Response Rates & Duration
    • Overall Response Rate (ORR): 77% with BPd vs 72% with PVd
    • Complete Response or Better: 40% vs 16% favoring BPd
    • Median Duration of Response: Not reached for BPd, vs ~17.5 months for PVd
  • Safety & Adverse Events
    Ocular adverse events were notably more frequent with BPd (grade 3/4 in 43% vs 2%). Overall AE rates were high across both arms (>95%) but manageable

Clinical Significance

  • These results mark a potential resurgence for belantamab mafodotin (Blenrep) in RRMM, especially following its market withdrawal after prior trial setbacks. Analysts are anticipating regulatory filings based on DREAMM-7/8 data to restore its role in treatment.
Share This Article
Facebook Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Email Copy Link Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • T-DXd Plus Pertuzumab Receives FDA Approval, Shifting the Frontline HER2-Positive Paradigm
  • FDA Approves Niraparib Plus Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone for BRCA2-Mutated mCSPC
  • FDA Approves Durvalumab for Resectable Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma
  • FDA Grants Traditional Approval to Pirtobrutinib (Jaypirca®) for CLL/SLL
  • Enfortumab Vedotin + Pembrolizumab for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC)

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

You Might Also Like ↷

Zongertinib approved for Her2 positive mutations in NSCLC

August 11, 2025

Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma Chemotherapy Free Option

August 10, 2025

AEGEAN trial perioperative Durvalumab NSCLC

August 11, 2025

FDA Approves Niraparib Plus Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone for BRCA2-Mutated mCSPC

December 15, 2025
Interactive Cancer Care Network

Powered By Designjoom-Empowering Brands since 2010